Nathan's Questions

[Julie Chen]

Nathan will ask his questions here.

Only Nathan, Hannah, and Katie are allowed to post here.

[Nathan]

I really don't know what to say to yall. I trusted both of you at the time of my eviction and both of yall betrayed me. What really hurt was the reasoning one of yall gave me and here it is

oh and this is for shawn @$$#0!e! its your fault hes gone

You know Katie I just put him up for nominations and if your "lustice leage" was really controlling the game like your buddy conner is ranting everywhere yall would of been able to prevent it.


Now for my questions

This is for both of yall:
I want you to list all of the jurors and list 4 qaulities( 2 good ones and 2 bad ones) saying why they should be in the F2 with you.

[Katie]

just a quick question before i answer.... i get the 2 good qualities part.... but 2 bad qualities why they should be in the final 2? if i list 2 bad qualities wouldnt that be why they SHOULDN'T be in the final 2..... i just want to answer yer question correctly!

[Nathan]

Yes katie...that is correct i should of worded that better

[Katie]

alrighty nathan i hope this is what u wanted it was very had to figure out some things for some of these people....

conner:
good- was part of the LUSTICE LEAGUE and won 3 hohs and 2 povs
bad- didnt beat me in part 3 and lied to angela about an alliance with her

alex:
good- won the first 2 comps and was a stand up guy
bad- allegedly lied to me and was too trusting

donna:
good- won when she needed to at the end and was the last of her alliance
bad- wasn’t in a good alliance and was too quiet

elyse:
good- never screwed n e 1 over and has a bad ass attitude
bad- not active and shouldve showed her attitude sooner

angela:
good- she slid under the radar until hoh #7 and shes the Asian Sensation
bad- thought she had a tight alliance with conner and only won 1 comp

nathan:
good- won key comps and was good competition
bad- was too trusting and didnt seem trust worthy

trey:
good- got to come back after being evicted and never lied
bad- he never posted, he wasnt active, and he was trey

I hope this did it for u

[Hannah]

ok I didn't understand what you wanted either, Nate. I see now and will write it out.


Nathan:
This is for both of yall:
I want you to list all of the jurors and list 4 qaulities( 2 good ones and 2 bad ones) saying why they should be in the F2 with you.

Nathan: Good: charming and friendly
Nathan should be here in F2, because he's a good player. Downfall was he was too trusting and too charming...so it was hard for me to know if he was genuine or if it was the charm in the game.

Elyse: Good: I really didn't to talk to her so i can't tell you her good points, which also means I don't know how she would have played the game. Her bad point...inactive.

Angela: Good: she was trusting and loyal. Bad: her activeness came into play too late into the game. If it was sooner, I think the outcome could have been different.

Conner: Good: he was very competitive and loyal to his alliance. Bad: too competitive and it made him a target alot, as with his vocalization...but it made things more fun.

Alex: Good: avatar looks nice. Bad: avatar looks nice.

Donna: good competitive and fierce; bad quiet and nice
Donna should be here instead of Katie because she stepped up her game at the end by winning hoh. She was going against 4 people and won hoh ruining some plans that the alliance thought it would work out.

Trey: Good: he was a vote for the alliance. Bad: inactiveness. I didn't know him either to really make a comment on his game.

Not sure if this is what you are looking for.

[Nathan]

Thank you both and good luck